1
Read the evidence in three distinct layers
Keep material evidence, scholarly interpretation, and later texts separate
Periods without contemporary writing cannot be explained simply by projecting later divine names or stories backward. This model separates archaeologically observable practice, scholarly interpretation, and narratives compiled from the eighth century onward.
1 · Contemporary material evidence
Scientific Findings: Based on verifiable research—peer-reviewed papers, genetics, archaeologyRecord placement, wear, breakage, and deposition
For dwellings, burials, pottery, dogu figurines, bronzes, tombs, and haniwa, findspot and chronology form the first layer of evidence.
2 · Scholarly interpretation
Leading Hypothesis: A research- or interpretation-level hypothesis, not yet the established consensus, and subject to revisionCompare models of ritual, power, and exchange
Repeated placement or deliberate breakage can support ritual interpretations, but function and meaning remain open to competing models.
3 · Texts from the 8th century onward
Historical Records: Based on historical records and archaeological evidence—the Kojiki, Nihon Shoki, Engishiki, excavation reportsThe chronicles also document their own age of compilation
The Kojiki and Nihon Shoki preserve older traditions but are not contemporary records of Jōmon or Yayoi life; any correspondence with material evidence must be tested case by case.